Good headline eh? A beat up? Don't be so sure. Gartner has
just released its 2014
Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, claiming that it "maps the journey
to digital business." It puts digital security at the very start of that
journey and on a slow road to the destination.
This journey is important. All the analysts are saying that
businesses must become digital to survive. I spent most of yesterday at Forrester's
CIO Summit in Sydney at which that message was driven home time and again.
It's neatly summed up in the introduction to a new Forrester
report The State Of Digital Business In Asia Pacific In 2014, due for release
later this month. "Regional CIOs must incorporate digital as a core
technology imperative. CIOs who ignore the impact of digital disruption do so
at their own peril. The only way to weather dynamic industry changes is to
incorporate systems that help your organisation win, serve, and retain
customers."
I'm sure you're familiar with the Hype Cycle. A new
technology starts with an innovation trigger, rises relatively rapidly to the
'peak of inflated expectations' before descending equally rapidly to the
'trough of disillusionment' and then, assuming it survives rises relatively
slowly up the 'slope of enlightenment' to the 'plateau of productivity'.
There are close to 50 emerging technologies spread across
this hype cycle, each individually coded with Gartner's estimate of how long
that technology will take to reach the plateau of productivity.
The one that caught my eye is right at the start of the
cycle with a 5 to 10 year time frame to productivity. It's labelled 'digital
security'. Surely not? The issues with security are well publicised but it is
an established and generally successful technology, if you take it to be a
blanket term covering the whole gamut of techniques and technologies used to
secure data in the digital world. That at least is how Wikipedia defines it (although
that article is flagged as having multiple issues).
Without access to Gartner's full report on the hype
cycle it's hard to know exactly what Gartner means by 'digital security'
but references in Gartner blogs etc suggest it to be a fairy general umbrella
term.
And indeed it seems that Gartner is forecasting the end of
security as we know it. In Gartner's top
10 predictions for 2014 there is one slide (slide 13) which predicts that:
"By 2020 enterprises and governments will fail to protect 75 percent of
sensitive data [and] will declassify and grant broad/public access to it."
It goes on to say: "Enterprises and government should
accept that sharing many seemingly sensitive data is neither dangerous or
unprofitable, politically and economically." It argues that the growth of
data will exceed protective mechanisms and that the best form of protection is
having nothing to protect.
Trouble is the same technologies than can be used exfiltrate
data can be used to infiltrate and disrupt systems that do much more than store
and process data: systems that control things, things like electricity supply,
lifts, life support systems etc, etc.
Another of Gartner's 2014 predictions is that "by 2024
at least 10 percent of activities potentially injurious to human life will
require mandatory use of a non-overidable smart system."
Non-overidable of course does not mean secure and
non-hackable. But hey, Gartner reckons digital security will reach have reached
the plateau of productivity by then so we can all relax.
No comments:
Post a Comment