The Joint Committee on the National Broadband Network
(JCNBN) has produced its fourth and penultimate report with scathing criticism
of the committee from chairman Rob Oakeshott.
"The tradition of committee membership in Australian
political culture is that adversarial politics is left at the door. It is a concern
to many that this culture is showing signs of changing on this committee, where
sensitivities of our oversight work as compared to political party election
platforms has made the work of the committee much more difficult than it need
be."
He concluded: "This is an early
warning sign that the topic of higher speed broadband technology is likely to
feature strongly in political debate throughout 2013, an election year."
Two months into the year and one month into the election
campaign this is very clearly the case, but this should come as no surprise to
Oakeshott, or anyone else who has followed the issue. The NBN has been high on
the political agenda ever since the Mark 1 (FTTN version) was unveiled by Labor
ahead of the 2007 election, highlighting the Coalition's inability to
articulate a coherent policy for broadbanding Australia.
The committee is due to produce its final report in
July/August, but Oakeshott has little confidence it will be able to do so.
"I am not confident that the focus of the committee is
an oversight of an existing build under the existing shareholder ministers
arrangements. Instead, I think the committee has become somewhat stuck on a
policy dispute between different build options, and will only deepen divisions
on this in the pre-election period. … There is every chance the next report
will be nothing more than a compendium of political statements and election
promises."
There was little evidence of this politicisation in the
dissenting report from Coalition committee members: most of their comments and
recommendations focussed on the way NBN Co is currently operating.
However one comment was seized on by communications minister
Stephen Conroy and used to "confirm" that the Coalition plans to
demolish the NBN. The dissenting report said that the benefits of changing
contract terms in the lead up to the September14 election needed to be clearly
articulated by NBN Co and that NBN Co and its board should be clearly mindful
of the possibility of a change of Government and the need to alter contracts
down the track.
"This clearly demonstrates that the Coalition plans to
demolish the NBN if it is elected," Conroy claimed.
Demolition is clearly not on the cards. Where fibre has been
installed it will be used, and much of the infrastructure in which NBN Co has
invested and is investing will still be needed to carry traffic to and from
whatever bits of equipment are used on the last mile. Only maintaining the
status quo with multiple DSLAM operators using Telstra's access network would
constitute demolition of the NBN.
That would be the worst possible outcome: a new Coalition
Government that gets so bogged down in trying to unravel Labor's NBN and
implementing an alternative that another electoral term passes with little or
no progress.
No matter who wins the next election one aspect of the NBN
won't change: the level of debate, the polarised opinions, the half-truths and
outright falsehoods peddled to promote one version and to condemn others.
Regardless of Coalition claims that it will be able to bring
acceptably fast broadband to more people sooner than the NBN, it won't simply
be a matter of going out and building it. There will be new arrangements to be
negotiated with Telstra. Due process will have to be followed. The ACCC will be
involved. Public enquiries will be needed, and the ALP, with its NBN ambitions
thwarted will do everything it can to keep the NBN issue front of mind with the
electorate.
This article first appeared on iTWire, Australia's leading independent IT&T news and information source.
No comments:
Post a Comment